Patent: Canon RF 11-24mm f/4L USM

Canon Rumors Guy

Canon EOS 40D
CR Pro
  • Jul 20, 2010
    9,778
    2,403
    Canada
    www.canonrumors.com
    Our earlier report of a new ultra wide angle RF L lens coming in the first half of 2023 gets a related patent application for a similar optical formula, along with others. asobinet found and first reported on this patent. Canon RF 10-20mm f/4 Canon RF 9-18mm f/4 Canon RF 11-24mm f/4L USM

    See full article...
     

    Steve Balcombe

    Too much gear
    Aug 1, 2014
    270
    198
    Interesting. Comparing the block diagrams of the EF 11-24/4L vs the 11-24 in the patent, they are very different. It looks like a completely new design, with full advantage being taken of the very short back focus.

    Unfortunately the EF 11-24 was very expensive when launched, and the RF lens will no doubt follow in its footsteps and then some.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: 1 user
    Upvote 0

    josephandrews222

    ...still learning
  • Jul 12, 2013
    497
    1,226
    64
    Midwest United States
    ...how effective is the IBIS when the R5 is mated to the adapted EF 11-24?

    I presume that none of the wide angle lenses included in the patent incorporate (in-lens) IS...

    I have found the IS feature present in the EF-M 11-22 to be invaluable for a wide variety of travel photography situations...and in general, this stabilized EF-M lens has (for me) replaced the (non IS) EF 17-40mm f4 for many uses.

    So I have long wondered about the IBIS capabilities of the R5, particularly for wide-angled non-stabilized EF (and now for the upcoming RF) lenses.
     
    Upvote 0

    neuroanatomist

    I post too Much on Here!!
    CR Pro
    Jul 21, 2010
    28,090
    8,303
    ...how effective is the IBIS when the R5 is mated to the adapted EF 11-24?

    I presume that none of the wide angle lenses included in the patent incorporate (in-lens) IS...

    I have found the IS feature present in the EF-M 11-22 to be invaluable for a wide variety of travel photography situations...and in general, this stabilized EF-M lens has (for me) replaced the (non IS) EF 17-40mm f4 for many uses.

    So I have long wondered about the IBIS capabilities of the R5, particularly for wide-angled non-stabilized EF (and now for the upcoming RF) lenses.
    I find the IBIS on my R3 to be very effective with my EF 11-24/4. That's what one would expect given that body stabilization is more effective at shorter focal lengths while lens stabilization is more effective at longer focal lengths.

    Screenshot 2023-01-18 at 12.15.08 PM.png
     
    • Like
    • Love
    Reactions: 3 users
    Upvote 0

    GMCPhotographics

    EOS 5D Mark IV
    CR Pro
  • Aug 22, 2010
    1,722
    446
    52
    Uk
    www.GMCPhotographics.co.uk
    The big question is...is it going to have drop in filters? Currently the Ef mount version has a huge advantage because there are ef-R mount adapters that allow a single drop in filter (ND or polariser). This is a lot more preferable then messing with gels on the rear mount slider.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: 1 users
    Upvote 0

    neuroanatomist

    I post too Much on Here!!
    CR Pro
    Jul 21, 2010
    28,090
    8,303
    The big question is...is it going to have drop in filters? Currently the Ef mount version has a huge advantage because there are ef-R mount adapters that allow a single drop in filter (ND or polariser). This is a lot more preferable then messing with gels on the rear mount slider.
    No room for that in the designs.

    Screenshot 2023-01-18 at 12.51.53 PM.png
     
    Upvote 0
    Oct 31, 2020
    405
    526
    I think astro shooters were probably hoping for something faster.
    I guess Astro shooters are hoping for a very fast UWA prime. Even if the rumored 14-28mm F2 (or something similar) will see the light of day, a lot of people rather have an F1.4 or F1.8 prime. So even if the 11-24mm was F2.8, it wouldn't attract any astro shooters and would into an enormous lens into gigantic one.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: 1 user
    Upvote 0

    Antono Refa

    EOS R
    Mar 26, 2014
    1,420
    514
    Canon might go for a halo lens like the 9-18mm f/4L so it could brag it has the widest lens with AF, or some such. Problem would be price. People might opt for an EF 11-24mm f/4L + adapter with drop in filter, esp for those who already bought a wide EF lens (EF 11-24mm, tilt shift, etc).

    Loosing sales to the adapter (or worse, 3rd party adapter it would make no money on) would be an incentive to make a lens with drop in adapter. On the other hand, Canon will probably prefer to go for a lens that gives customers a choice they don't have.
     
    Upvote 0
    Our earlier report of a new ultra wide angle RF L lens coming in the first half of 2023 gets a related patent application for a similar optical formula, along with others. asobinet found and first reported on this patent. Canon RF 10-20mm f/4 Canon RF 9-18mm f/4 Canon RF 11-24mm f/4L USM

    See full article...
    Are these RF or RF-S lenses ?
     
    Upvote 0
    I would be interested in a RF replacement for the EF 11-24 F4 lens. 10mm would be cool and the ability to accommodate a drop in filter would be a must. I used to have the Panoflex filters for the front of the 11-24mm and they are so unwieldy. The adapter with drop in filter is such a great alternative. This range is so much fun for dramatic landscapes with compelling foreground elements. I will take the F4 especially if the patented fast UWA RF lenses come to fruition.

    Bob
     
    Upvote 0