Comments for Canon Rumors – Your best source for Canon rumors, leaks and gossip https://www.canonrumors.com/ Canon Rumors - Your best source for Canon rumors, leaks and gossip Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:28:56 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.1 Comment on This & That by Bill Chicken https://www.canonrumors.com/this-that/comment-page-6/#comment-57369 Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:28:56 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=4564#comment-57369 In reply to Oh yeah.

I’m not sure where the OP got his info but if it was posted on the home page then I’d say there’s a 99.99999% chance of it being true. I love sitting around with my photography buddies and shooting the breeze and I’ll tell them what’s coming up in the future with Canon and they don’t believe me. I always get the last laugh and their gradually catching on! And I refuse to tell them about this site because there starting to think I’m a god!

]]>
Comment on This & That by Bill Chicken https://www.canonrumors.com/this-that/comment-page-6/#comment-57368 Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:25:39 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=4564#comment-57368 Stop insulting people here you don’t know them ok? I come here because the information is almost ALWAYS right and I can find information almost a year ahead of time. And its not a circular rumer since that UK website got the information from here. CANONRUMORS #1.

]]>
Comment on This & That by Bill Chicken https://www.canonrumors.com/this-that/comment-page-6/#comment-57367 Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:23:05 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=4564#comment-57367 In reply to Cornell.

Just because the sources are unnamed doesn’t mean that it’s not factual. This entire site is built on information from inside connections at Canon. You don’t see the editor here naming names do you? Yet all the information he posts is accurate and time after time it ends up being right. Your just a nay-sayer why are you even on this site if you don’t beleive information from unnamed sources???

]]>
Comment on This & That by My https://www.canonrumors.com/this-that/comment-page-6/#comment-57366 Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:15:49 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=4564#comment-57366 In reply to Oh yeah.

Besides, haven’t we already established that an EVIL system would need new lenses to fully realise the potential size and weight reduction?

EF-S is just another legacy compatibility issue for an EVIL system.

]]>
Comment on The Future of EOS Lenses? [CR1] by Bob https://www.canonrumors.com/the-future-of-eos-lenses-cr1/comment-page-12/#comment-57365 Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:57:49 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=4557#comment-57365 In reply to neuroanatomist.

Or, if you want to be more precise (I’m bored):

(ln(1.4) – ln(1.2)) / ln(sqrt(2)) = 0.445

So, f/1.4 is 0.445 stops slower than f/1.2, or half a stop, if you want to round it off.

]]>
Comment on This & That by MOOSE https://www.canonrumors.com/this-that/comment-page-6/#comment-57364 Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:26:51 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=4564#comment-57364 In reply to DEER.

He’s taking it literally :D
Anyway, never knew Canon was developing torpedos, but seeing their telelenses, i can understand it. If one hits a Nikon, there’s going to be trouble.

]]>
Comment on This & That by Freeze_XJ https://www.canonrumors.com/this-that/comment-page-6/#comment-57363 Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:17:33 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=4564#comment-57363 In reply to Scott.

Then the 50L is highly due for an update… which it is anyway. I mean, it’s soft wide open (more so than others), it has a horrible focus shift, CA, doesn’t get sharper than the 1.8 at say f/4, and it’s pretty expensive (although not absurd, if it was a good lens). If Canon fixes that, i’d be a happy camper :)
If they don’t, Sigma will be the one getting the sale. Or Samyang, even :D

]]>
Comment on Announcement & Lots of Stuff [CR1] by Hannes https://www.canonrumors.com/announcement-lots-of-stuff-cr1/comment-page-3/#comment-57362 Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:08:56 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=4553#comment-57362 In reply to Chuck.

amen – I’m with you too, 7D to expensive (and to “pro”) 50D to old … when that goes on i may buy a 550 or … i dunno

]]>
Comment on This & That by My https://www.canonrumors.com/this-that/comment-page-6/#comment-57361 Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:31:11 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=4564#comment-57361 In reply to hutjeflut.

You say that, but I get pains in my thumb after using my 50D for a long time. It’s not the same for everyone… but I should probably work on my grip :)

]]>
Comment on This & That by zalmagor https://www.canonrumors.com/this-that/comment-page-6/#comment-57360 Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:52:09 +0000 http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=4564#comment-57360 In reply to clydo.

An upgrade to the EF 50mm f/1.4 would be nice, as would be a new EF 8mm circular fisheye.

]]>