What’s with the flippy MF/AF switch on the front of these mock ups? No other R camera has this. What’s that about?
Innovation?
There's also a DoF preview button in the middle of the switch.
Upvote
0
What’s with the flippy MF/AF switch on the front of these mock ups? No other R camera has this. What’s that about?
The 2014 7D Mark II has essentially the same pixel density as the 2015 5Ds and 5Ds R, thus it has the same "reach". (It's 4.09µm vs. 4.14µm, so the crop body has a miniscule advantage in pixel density.)
those cameras are like 20 years old bruh escept the 5DS.I guess you thought the 1Ds, 1Ds Mark II, 1Ds Mark III (all higher resolution FF versions of the various APS-H 1D models), as well as the 5Ds and 5Ds R were all "bs" as well?
The R5 is still listed at $3,899 at any reputable Canon dealer in the U.S.
If you're talking about a "CPW" kind of deal, then wait until the R7 has been out almost two years and compare the "CPW" price of the R7 at that time.
$1,499 + $2,499 = $3,998, only $99 more than $3,899.
You then have two bodies that are extremely usable tools for different use cases. Having two bodies that can be used to hang a wider angle lens on the FF body and a longer lens on the APS-C body at the same time can also be very useful in many situations.
It is true that the R5 can do almost anything that either the R6 or the R7 can do, but it can't do much (besides 8K video) that either the R6 or the R7 could match. And it can't mount two different lenses at the same time. Or be its own backup when it has a glitch.
Thanks for making my point.
Another note, when quoting someone use their quote. It is annoying to see a quote box with your name on it and words you never typed.
those cameras are like 20 years old bruh escept the 5DS.
Thanks for making my point.
You did. When your comments appear inside a quote box with someone else's name on it. It appears as if they had previously said it.Everything in the quote box in my comment to which you replied was in your post.
Bold text in the middle of my comment is not a quote box.
You are partially right. I had two 7D Mark II. They could shoot twice the frames which half would be out of focus. So usable frames were about equal. You didn't have an infinite number of JPEGS, no computer could store that many. The 7D II was a Cheaper camera than the 5Ds R. Notice the word Cheaper rather than Less Expensive or Better Value.Thanks for leaving out the main part of my point:
The 7D Mark II could shoot twice as fast for twice as many raw frames and infinitely more JPEGs at half the price of the 5Ds R.
You did. When your comments appear inside a quote box with someone else's name on it. It appears as if they had previously said it.
You are partially right. I had two 7D Mark II. They could shoot twice the frames which half would be out of focus. So usable frames were about equal. You didn't have an infinite number of JPEGS, no computer could store that many. The 7D II was a Cheaper camera than the 5Ds R. Notice the word Cheaper rather than Less Expensive or Better Value.
As well when properly framed the 5Ds R had twice as many pixels on target and a great resolution advantage.
Sure you didn'tPlease point out to me and everyone else here a single word or punctuation mark that was inside the quote box of my comment that was not inside your original comment?
There's no more pixels on target with a FF 50MP sensor than a 20 MP APS-C camera. As we've both already agreed, the 7D Mark II has slightly higher pixel density (4.09µm vs. 4.14µm) than the 5Ds. With the same lens the "reach" is practically identical. The 5Ds just gave you more of the scene surrounding the subject. In "reach limited" situations, that additional 61% is almost always superfluous.
There are twice as many when the picture is properly framed. Only when you crop the FF sensor to the exact same says would they be equal.
Edited.
Cost. Birders. Sports. Etc.Why are people so excited about an aps-c camera that's gonna be bigger than the M system, both body and lenses? Why not just go full frame? I don't get it.