Just sold my R6 for the Sony A7IV, based on what I am seeing here, I am not disappointed one bit.
Upvote
0
All firmware. Any downloadable firmware update would have satisfied an R6 upgrade. Its a total waste of money. Not worth $1500 let alone $2500 + taxThis is hands down the Best Canon hybrid camera for event work or social media work. Yeah the R3 and R7 maybe can compete, but either you pay $6k or get a cropped sensor.
False color?
No Record Limit
6k RAW?????
An IMMEDIATE Photo/Video switch?
Fast Custom Functions?
Literally only complaint I have is the Micro HDMI port.
I’ve placed my preorder
Faster sensor, better AF cause of the faster sensor, better button layout, plus not everything is possible via firmware if there are hardware limitations and obviously there where some.I all-ready know few that will replace the R6 with the R6mk2 including me.All firmware. Any downloadable firmware update would have satisfied an R6 upgrade. Its a total waste of money. Not worth $1500 let alone $2500 + tax
I think the ocean is full from all of the threatened ship jumpers.Business as usual...
- Raising exaggerated expectations ( $5500 camera's features in a $3000 camera )
- Being angry or disappointed Canon didn't meet one's pressing demand
- Canon bashing, what else?
The cycle is complete, only threatening to jump ship is (till now) missing.
I think you are missing the point. If an R6 is worth $2500 why isn't the R62 worth $2500?All firmware. Any downloadable firmware update would have satisfied an R6 upgrade. It's a total waste of money. Not worth $1500 let alone $2500 + tax
Same flash power as a 600EX and same master capabilities, so IMO a good replacement for those with a compatible camera.So apparently 600ex has been discontinued and EL-5 is supposed to bridge gap between 430 and EL-1. Over UI, buttons and battery source for both EL-1 & EL-5 are same which is a good thing.
It was going to have a stacked sensor, because stacked sensors are so much cheaper to produce, right? I mean, you positively assured everyone that was the case based on your vast knowledge of sensor fabrication costs. How could Canon be so stupid as to use a much more expensive aged image sensor then a new, cheaper stacked sensor that would mean much higher profits for them?Will not purchase another high end camera with these old aged image sensors.
Speedlite bigot.Not stacked or even BSI. Meh. "Functions" based on firmware. Unbelieveable. Not worth $2499. Another mediocre old image sensor. Canon and Sony close out the year trying to bamboozle with firmware. The RF 135 1.8 is the only thing exciting
Do not forget France or the UK.Indeed, our healthcare system in DACH (Germany, Switzerland, Austria) is very good. Maybe not efficient, especially at some hospital groups you get an extra surgical intervention if our DRG system adds some points. But for almost all treatments you do not have to pay extra and the quality is good.
The market will decide, if Canon is able to hold the prices high. If a lot of consumers and influencer think, e.g. the Sony A7 IV and their 135mm GM is better - and a lot cheaper- , then Canon has to lower prices very fast. If in our minds Canon makes incredible products (like Apple) they will be able to keep up their pricing policy.
As I wrote in another thread, it is intersting, that the US$ to € conversion rate varies between the 6RII (1:1,16!!) and the RF 135, that is about 1:1,28. Maybe because an lens is kept a lot longer, than an body.
How many times do you need to repeat yourself? It's close to spamming the thread. We get it, you're upset. One post stating that would be sufficient.Will not purchase another high end camera with these old aged image sensors. Not gonna purchase firmware for $2500. Im not that gullible. Give me some damn new hardware. Gees. All this BS firmware coding that one can simply download. Give me a damn break. All of these $1500 cameras should have first gen stacked image sensors at a minimum. We are now on generation 3. Going on 2023 and they are milking the old crap. Its not even a BSI sensor. Simply rediculous. Anyone halfway tech savy doesn't purchase firmware coding updates for $2500 + tax unless they simply dont mind throwing away moola.
This is a genuine question: how would a BSI stacked sensor help with wedding photography, specifically?TBH If they'd released it at 3500 with a BSI stacked sensor I would have bought it.
Except the general market probably isn't there. I shoot weddings professionally and can't use a form factor larger than the R5/R6 - It's just too big when you add a lens for all day use with two bodies. I expect the R5 mkii will get something like a 39mp BSI stacked and then Canon will drop a 90+ mp camera to counter the drop in R5 resolution.
Better low Light, faster read out speed would prevent banding using electronic shutterThis is a genuine question: how would a BSI stacked sensor help with wedding photography, specifically?
Thanks.Better low Light, faster read out speed would prevent banding using electronic shutter